Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strength level

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strength level

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Wikipedia is not a dictionary, therefore this article is unencyclopedic as it only provides a dictionary definition of this crufty concept. _{ZXCVBNM (TALK)} 01:02, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - No references whatsoever. Fails WP:CBALL. 344917661X (talk) 14:13, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 13:55, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - If this term is used in an article, its meaning will be clear through context. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No coverage in RS. wumbolo ^^^ 14:19, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this idea is not notable. However, the term is used in chemistry for a different concept. Bearian (talk) 00:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.