Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Streamup
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was KeepJacobiJonesJr (talk) 04:56, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- Streamup (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I think we should have a discussion to determine notability and the necessity of the article. JacobiJonesJr (talk) 02:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 02:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I believe this is notable considering Streamup has been covered in Variety (magazine) as one of just a handful of noteworthy streaming media companies capable of reaching a presence as significant as Twitch with their recent acquisition by Amazon.com.[1] Respectfully, I understand your point that Wiki shouldn't contain insignificant articles, but there are only several significant streaming media platforms left and this is one of them. Kyledmichelson (talk) 05:20, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. I did not have an opinion either way, but mention in variety sways me this way.JacobiJonesJr (talk) 05:30, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- JacobiJonesJr, in that case, do you think a WP:WDAFD makes sense? Kyledmichelson (talk) 05:54, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- ^ After Twitch, Is Ustream the Next Billion-Dollar Target? Retrieved 2014-09-02.