The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Non-notable toy in an unreferenced, avert-like article. Mikeblas 23:07, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no references provided. No coverage of teh product beyond catalog type listings found when searching. -- Whpq 23:29, 27 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom Userpie 17:37, 28 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, reads like...something useless. --Phoenix (talk) 17:56, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
