Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strawberry Lane, Hammond, Louisiana
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. JForget 00:22, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strawberry Lane, Hammond, Louisiana (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable local street. No clear significance of the street established, and no sources whatsoever provided. A bulk of the article also appears to be original research. Article was deprodded by creator and does not fit a CSD criterion. —C.Fred (talk) 18:13, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Non-notable original research... with an apparently made up history... no more notable than any other small street... - Adolphus79 (talk) 18:20, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - I'm usually kind to streets but I can't find anything of note here. Nothing of historic interest. A middle school and a cooking school seem to be on this street, but I don't see that as reason to have an article about it. --Oakshade (talk) 20:49, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like a homework assignment. Teachers, it's great for kids to learn how to use Wikipedia, but a user page is more suitable for a lesson plan. Mandsford (talk) 23:21, 27 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Louisiana-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:36, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, unreferenced self-promotion New seeker (talk) 11:48, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - WP:LOOKATMYAWESOMETERMPAPER. /Blaxthos ( t / c ) 21:51, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Fails WP:GNG. Richard (talk) 01:24, 3 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.