Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Strategy of unbalanced growth

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Courcelles 21:12, 14 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Strategy of unbalanced growth[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources, poor content. Shrug-shrug (talk) 15:16, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 00:37, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a valid topic [1]. There would be enough literature to create a valid article [2]. --Pass3456 (talk) 15:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:Notable topic - I have added some refs. (Msrasnw (talk) 09:30, 11 September 2011 (UTC))[reply]
Keep: Is there some way for me to withdraw the nomination? It has been improved far beyond it's original status, and should be kept. Shrug-shrug (talk) 17:14, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.