Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Straight panic defence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KrakatoaKatie 02:39, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Straight panic defence[edit]

Neologism Boson (talk) 22:30, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Adds nothing to the correct term, Provocation (legal). Tevildo (talk) 22:41, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete WP:SNOW - Vandalism? Certainly more than hints of homophobia. Non notable neologism. Springnuts (talk) 23:46, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. GregorB (talk) 23:50, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete - interestingly, PROD was opposed. Pundit|utter 23:52, 13 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete makes little sense to me. Anyway lawyers are always looking for any reason they can hold onto to get their clients off regardless of whether their client did it or not. This is an example of how weak some of their arguments can be. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Stevethompson76051 (talk • contribs) 03:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - The creation of this article stretches the bounds of good faith. It lifts some text almost verbatim from gay panic defense (an actual much-reviled legal defense) and uses it to create something that looks very much like a hoax article. Unsourced neologism crying out for a merciful demise. --SSBohio 03:46, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as evident hoax, and can we apply WP:SNOW? bikeable (talk) 05:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:HOAX or at least its a NN WP:NEO and/or made up Doc Strange (talk) 19:03, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete agree with all above. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 20:08, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete faster as above – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 01:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.