Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Storyline of Kevin and Kell
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. PeaceNT (talk) 15:22, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Storyline of Kevin and Kell (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Contested prod. The article is entirely plot summary; per WP:PLOT, "A brief plot summary may sometimes be appropriate as an aspect of a larger topic." Since summaries should be brief, we don't need separate articles for them. Powers T 13:42, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - not only WP:PLOT but looks to be vast tracts of WP:OR as well. Otto4711 13:58, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - pretty thoroughly violates WP:NOT#PLOT and lacks any kind of referencing. Plot sub-articles should discuss the significance of the plot, criticism, reception and development, not just summarize it. In this case, I think it can be done in the main Kevin and Kell article; this isn't exactly a work of fiction spawning great amounts of scholarly review. Leebo T/C 15:30, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Hardly "a brief plot summary". - EronTalk 16:21, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Fails WP:PLOT by design. No sources for real world context, and it appears that there is no intention to include real world context if sources existed. Jay32183 23:41, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: I created this article because the main article Kevin and Kell had a very long plot summary. I didn't want to delete the whole thing, nor did I want to write a brief summary. -- Madd the sane (talk) 18:27, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Can you see how the above mentioned policy applies though? Articles shouldn't exist solely for the purpose of summarizing a work of fiction. Such detail is never necessary. Leebo T/C 18:32, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Following up on the above, deleting the whole thing would have been quite appropriate under the above-referenced policy regarding plot summaries. - EronTalk 18:57, 16 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.