Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stones by william bell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per WP:CSD A10 by Orangemike (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA). NAC. Timotheus Canens (talk) 10:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stones by william bell[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a book review, in the homework-posted-online style. This book may or may not be notable, but this entry doesn't make the case for it. Declined prod. Hairhorn (talk) 01:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete - Wikipedia is not a repository for homework.~~ —DoRD (talk) 01:56, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I initially fell foul of WP:BEFORE in prodding the article. The edits I've made (for the time being leaving in the creator's plot and character sections) and sources I've added, in my view, indicate the book is notable per WP:BK. It has been the subject of at least two independent reviews, and has won what appears to be a fairly major literary award. Excuse my no doubt substandard editing of this article, I've not edited articles on books before. If this is kept, the article should be moved to a better title. --Mkativerata (talk) 01:57, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article already exists at Stones (novel), I only just found that now. You might want to simply move your edits there, and let this more poorly titled page die off. Barring that we can do a redirect, but this is a poorly capitalized redirect. Cheers. Hairhorn (talk) 02:03, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Merge - In light of the above, merge this to Stones (novel). —DoRD (talk) 02:12, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
~~.Merge per above!~~ Now that I've moved my edits over and the article's creator reverted my edits (!), Speedy delete per A10 --Mkativerata (talk) 02:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.