Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stoned Fish Gaming

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. BJ^Talk 02:09, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stoned Fish Gaming[edit]

Author removed endorsed prod without explanation or editing to adress the concerns raised, which were that this group has no reliable sources to establish it's notability. Beeblbrox (talk) 17:36, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged Speedy A7 (Web). --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 17:40, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think you mean A7 (Corp) since the article is about a company that makes web content, not about the web content itself. I've changed the CSD tag. Olaf Davis | Talk 17:51, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry guys, speedy and PROD have already been tried, that's why we're here. Beeblbrox (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, apparently speedy deletion was declined, according to the article's history. MuZemike (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, speedily if possible. No claims or indication of notability. No sources, reliable or otherwise. Pburka (talk) 18:27, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete — this looks like a WP:HOAX; if not, the article has no context and certainly no notability nor any proof thereof. MuZemike (talk) 19:01, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I kind of doubt it is a hoax, as they do have a website with chat forums, etc, but even the administrators are listed as "newbies" at the forum, so probably it is just too new and unknown to qualify as notable. Beeblbrox (talk) 20:39, 19 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - could not find any reliable sources in order to demonstrate notability or verifiability. I'd suggest by extension that the article fails the notability guidelines on corporations.Gazimoff ^Write _Read 12:19, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.