Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stolen-fears

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:51, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stolen-fears[edit]

The article describes unverifiable events and was originally written by a user named "Stolenfears." It shows every sign of being a fictitious vanity page written by an individual who fancies himself a vigilante. Mary Read 09:48, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, possible vanity hoax. Also delete the redirect Stolenfears. --Canley 10:33, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as unverified. On the odd chance this isn't a hoax, would reconsider. Marskell 11:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of UK-related deletions. -- Canley 10:39, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unsourced and seems like a hoax. PJM 12:31, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unverifiable - "The obligation to provide a reputable source lies with the editors wishing to include the material" WP:V.--Blue520 12:42, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Gwernol 16:12, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as above. Also, the article claims that the authorities are looking for this guy. I think we found him. --Deville (Talk) 19:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 05:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete My Spidey-sense says this is a hoax. Nigelthefish 15:52, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Moe ε 02:23, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.