Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockland Batemans Bay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, default to keep. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 23:48, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stockland Batemans Bay

Contested prod. Seems to fail notability via the lack of reliable sources establishing its real world significance. Izno (talk) 16:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 16:24, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As a major mall it is notable to its region. I removed an NPOV tag from it, FYI. It didn't seem to have that problem.--CastAStone /^{/₵₳$↑₳}^{₴₮ʘ№€} 16:36, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I wasn't able to find coverage in non-trivial third-party sources showing notability. - 2 ... says you, says me 16:42, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- WP:NOTE -- Sk8er5000 (talk) 06:57, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It is a major centre and an article is needed. I have now fixed the article, added references, added information and moved the article to Village Centre Batemans Bay per the centre's new name. --Whats new? (talk) 02:15, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable regional centre, has sufficient third-party sources. Rebecca (talk) 05:05, 29 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.