Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stipula

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:42, 9 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stipula

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meed WP:NCORP. The only sources are catalog listings of its products. Searching does not turn up significant in-depth coverage of the company. MB 15:54, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 16:20, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Blog entries indicate that the original company encountered financial problems around 6 years ago and was acquired by another firm (Antiche Fabbriche Firenze), but I am not finding reliable sources which could support material on ownership (or whether production continues) or anything beyond listing sites for the past products. Not sufficient for WP:NCORP or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 16:29, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nomination.TH1980 (talk) 03:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nomination. Mccapra (talk) 09:42, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lack of sufficient reliable sources and failure of WP:GNG Reddragon7 (talk) 03:58, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.