Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sticktoitism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 01:58, 2 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sticktoitism

Neologism, 3 Google hits. Prod tag removed by original contributor without comment or editing. Accurizer 00:09, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nn neologism. --Hyperbole 00:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pointless neologism. Royboy crashfan 00:12, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Sticktoitiveness is kinda-sorta-almost a real word, but this isn't. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 00:29, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - horrible newspeak. --MacRusgail 00:45, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - doubleplusbad quacknonsense. --Jay(Reply) 01:03, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I believe you mean doubleplusungood kotepho 03:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Deleetitquicklyism is a principle that advocates deleting wikipedia articles that create neologisms or otherwise offend against the wiki-gods. Bucketsofg 01:10, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as neologism --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 01:14, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Neologism --light darkness^(talk) 01:19, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Rob from NY 01:49, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - as per above reasons. --Spook ^{(my talk | my contribs)} 02:37, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. --S iva1979^{Talk to me} 02:59, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete wp not a dictionary.. slang guide.. idiom guide.. NOT this. kotepho 03:23, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per above --LBMixPro ^<Sp ^e ^ak|on|it!> 04:24, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Ralph roberts removed AfD tag, and deleted this discussion.
Delete I deleted this article as a non-notable neologism when it first appeared: {{db-repost}} could apply. Warning message for author left at the time. (aeropagitica) 06:38, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. JIP | Talk 06:51, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Axl 09:39, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, neologism. --Ter e nc e Ong 10:26, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all. +Hexagon1 (talk) 10:32, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:NFT Jdcooper 18:21, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom --Ugur Basak 21:34, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Jon Calla 03:56, 1 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.