Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stick RPG 2

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Core des at 03:48, 29 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Stick RPG 2[edit]

Crystal ball article. Game is still in development, and the article even states it has been in development for a few years and made relatively little progress compared to other game devolopment [sic] times causing great criticism. NMChico24 21:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is unverifiable. ColourBurst 23:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I agree, when I searched the article on Google, the sources are very suspect at best. I highly doubt their reliability. Wikipediarul e s 2221 01:05, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, Re-create once/if its release seems to be concrete Derktar 01:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as unverified. I wouldn't even recreate if it were released, since I would question the series' notability. I'm wondering if Stick RPG, Stick Arena, and even XGenStudios should be AFDed. --Targetter ^{(Lock On)} 01:23, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Vaporware needs to be pretty special to pass the crystal ball test. Stick figures don't rank as "pretty special". Caknuck 01:28, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --BrownHairedGirl ^{(talk) • (contribs)} 02:44, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Seems a bit crystal-ball-ish. Could perhaps be moved to a subsection of Stick RPG, but has no merit for an article at this stage of development. Michael Billington (talk • contribs) 09:43, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as it is unverifiable. JoeSmack ^Talk(p-review!) 17:13, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge with Stick RPG and then redirect. - Lex 20:25, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge — with Stick RPG and redirect, but only if sources can be provided. Otherwise, Delete. M a rtinp23 21:36, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. -- moe.RON ^{talk | done | doing} 02:06, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all above.UberCryxic 02:37, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. The Kinslayer 09:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Stick RPG presuming sourcing can be proved and delete otherwise as per Martin. JoshuaZ 02:11, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.