Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steven McKagen (3rd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:38, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Steven McKagen[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and lacks WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Football, and Oceania. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:50, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 21:24, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG. I looked for some sources but was not able to find any on him. Fats40boy11 (talk) 08:24, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no evidence of notability. If sources are found please ping me. Giant Snowman 15:15, 25 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question Sportsfan 1234 can you tell us of any searches you did to find information, and if you found anything even hits that did not add towards passing GNG?John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I did a search on google. I was not able to find anything that amounted to indepth coverage. I found some places where the name was included in what looked like it would have information, but no information was provided. I also found this page [1] that merely the name listing and seems to indicate he was used as a sub during a match. I could not find anything that would indicate indepth coverage. That was when I added "football" to the search. When I did a search with just the name, I found lots of hits on a person with the same name who is an ecologist, although at least on the first page none of those look to be GNG passing either.John Pack Lambert (talk) 17:31, 27 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete clearly not in line with gng BIG BURLEY 17:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.