Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve propes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Cirt (talk) 19:49, 14 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Steve propes[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject fails WP:BIO criteria for inclusion on Wikipedia Wiki libs (talk) 13:43, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:18, 5 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep (after fix to title capitalization). Needs expansion, but books authored contain original scholarship with an affect on their (non-academic) field. LotLE×talk 19:33, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:22, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Steve was a significant presence on the L. A. radio scene for a number of years. I'm not familiar with his books, but it sounds like he made some real contributions. DutchmanInDisguise (talk) 06:05, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Needs some referencing, but definitely notable personality in music, talk show radio, and a good music writer. sulmues --Sulmues 19:26, 12 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.