Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Wyrostek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 21:39, 30 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Wyrostek[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable author and my searches found nothing good at all with the only links being this, this, this and this and there are probably more mentions but none of this accumulates to a better article, as an author or musician. Notifying past user Froid who edited Steve Wyrostek in January 2012. NOTE: I'm also co-nominating another author, Jill Dearman, for which I found no good coverage aside from the usual Books results and a few reviews at Highbeam. SwisterTwister talk 05:05, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is the Jill Dearman AfD included in this one or separate? I think it would be best for it to be separate -- I don't see how they are related. I also haven't had the time to look for sources for Dearman. LaMona (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:06, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Was too soon, and the future book notability did not pan out. As far as I can tell, the book he was seeking a publisher for did not happen. Nor did anything else of notability. LaMona (talk) 15:06, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

LaMona I'm actually nominating both articles in one so do you have comments about Jill Dearman? SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I'm not convinced that his book on Trantel will be notable, and without that his achievements are minuscule. NB The deletion notice on Dearman's article actually points here. 80.91.63.2 (talk) 19:42, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
DGG Would you like to comment? SwisterTwister talk 20:13, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete both . Wyrostek--his band does not seem notable; his writings certainly aren't: an unwritten book do not give notability. PRWeb is a useless source in any case. Jill Dearman has at least published an atual bpok, tho it has very few library holdings. The article is very highly promotional in a personal way, and the notability isnt nearly enough to warrant a rescue. DGG ( talk ) 22:14, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.