Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Sarracino

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 09:06, 18 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Sarracino[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reviewed as part of new page curation process. IMO misses wp:notability by a long shot. No suitable coverage for wp:notability. Secondary source coverage is just brief mentions or quotes. Nothing even claimed in the article indicates wp:notability. A sidebar concern is that the creator is obviously wiki-experienced but has only 22 lifetime edits under this user name, all on 2 corporate bios and one business. Sincerely, North8000 (talk) 14:50, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:06, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 15:07, 10 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete None of the sources that are reliable are actually about Sarracino. Best, GPL93 (talk) 17:54, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.