Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve P. Mullins

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎ . ✗plicit 12:32, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Steven P. Mullins

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Steven P. Mullins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Certainly accomplished, but I can't find enough in-depth coverage to show they meet notability. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 09:33, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Virginia, and Washington, D.C.. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 09:38, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

  Delete, SEC filings and PR news don't help with RS, rest are passing mentions. I find pretty much the same level of coverage about him. Oaktree b (talk) 19:55, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:16, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

• Delete Very little that is in the article is verifiable in the sources. There are a lot of statements like: "Held many positions" that are sourced to one article that confirms that he held one position. I find no significant independent sources about him that would support notability, although there are a few local sources with "local boy did good" stories. I note that the article was created by an SPA who joined only in the last few weeks. Lamona (talk) 03:58, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.