Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Lettunich
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:49, 16 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Lettunich[edit]
- Steve Lettunich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
State chair of national organization: no reason given demonstrating notability beyond that. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:45, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:35, 8 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Are you also going to delete every College Republic national chair? I think you need to also delete these articles as well. The organization is clearly notable and as its head he meets the notability guidelines.Theseus1776 (talk) 04:47, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- By your standards this article should be deleted as well: Zach Howell.Theseus1776 (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There's a distinct lack of assertion of notability in that article, but Howell is a national chair: Lettunich was a state chair. If you want to nominate Howell, feel free. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't want to nominate either, but by your standards Howell should be deleted as well. Also, being the state chairman of Texas is notable in it of itself. Texas has over 30 million people; you could be a "national chair" and still be less notable than Texas'. There are no claims of notability in Howell's article, and for sake of consistency you should nominate it for deletion.Theseus1776 (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are fewer citations for the former state chairman of the Republican Party of Texas than this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tina_BenkiserTheseus1776 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, that's bad. Think you can add a few quickly? BLPs shouldn't be left in that condition, but I have to head to work.... --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There are fewer citations for the former state chairman of the Republican Party of Texas than this article: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tina_BenkiserTheseus1776 (talk) 16:14, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't want to nominate either, but by your standards Howell should be deleted as well. Also, being the state chairman of Texas is notable in it of itself. Texas has over 30 million people; you could be a "national chair" and still be less notable than Texas'. There are no claims of notability in Howell's article, and for sake of consistency you should nominate it for deletion.Theseus1776 (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- There's a distinct lack of assertion of notability in that article, but Howell is a national chair: Lettunich was a state chair. If you want to nominate Howell, feel free. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 15:39, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- By your standards this article should be deleted as well: Zach Howell.Theseus1776 (talk) 15:36, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. No automatic notability attaches to the position, coverage in secondary sources is trivial to non-existent. RayTalk 23:12, 9 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, state chair of a national organization, does not have sufficient coverage per WP:GNG to warrant a standalone article. --Kinu t/c 07:12, 10 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.