Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Hagerty (2nd nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Early keep per consensus on WP:GNG and the nominator's withdrawal. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 22:18, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Hagerty[edit]

Steve Hagerty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Coverage is mainly based on local sources. Evanston, Illinois is a city of roughly 80,000 people, and its local newspapers do not provide the level of "significant" coverage required by WP:POLITICIAN. Edge3 (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Edge3 (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Edge3 (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. Edge3 (talk) 17:45, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, RL0919 (talk) 22:30, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Weak keep as a GNG pass (decent, well-sourced article on the person). Elli (talk | contribs) 19:59, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Withdraw I've considered Elli's comment above, and I concede that GNG may provide sufficient evidence of notability for this person. Edge3 (talk) 04:15, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.