Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Gong
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 08:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Steve Gong[edit]
- Steve Gong (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable person. Whenever proposed for deletion the proposal seems to be removed either by an IP address or non-registered user without any further reason given. ScottishEditor (talk) 16:19, 23 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:11, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 03:57, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - See references section of article. Significant coverage in reliable sources, including this article in TIME Magazine, which generally doesn't cover "non-notable" people. Northamerica1000(talk) 12:00, 2 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I found even more coverage of him in a Korean newspaper [1]. Dream Focus 15:38, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.