Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Golieb
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 04:54, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.
However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts:{{subst:spa|username}} ; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}} ; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}} . |
- Steve Golieb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Autobiography, heavily edited by single purpose accounts and suspected sockpuppets. Contested PROD. Seems like a case of a person only known locally for one minor event. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:33, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nominated: not notable. X MarX the Spot (talk) 23:43, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Utah-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 08:30, 23 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete No third party coverage [1] Michellecrisp (talk) 05:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.