Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Day

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. (aeropagitica) 00:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Day[edit]

Delete nn poetry by nn poet and adventurer. No obvious Google matches. Gimboid13 01:46, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Poetrycruft. Unable to find any further information about this person as well. — TheKMan^talk 01:51, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, unencyclopedic. WP:NOT#Wikipedia is not a soapbox Royboy crashfan 02:07, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete WP:NOT. --die Baumfabrik 02:43, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. Dlyons493 Talk 04:03, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:17, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non notable and possible copyvio. Jude(talk,contribs) 07:52, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non notable, doesn't really contain anything but the poem in its current state? -- Samir ∙ T C 08:10, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per all of above. savidan^{(talk) (e@)} 09:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete nn. --Ter e nc e Ong 09:02, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, as non-notable --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 13:01, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Shoulda just used {{prod}} on this one. Cyde Weys 22:00, 8 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.