Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Cleveland

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 • (talk) 21:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Cleveland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only a collegiate head coach, thus fails WP:NHOOPS after satisfying none of the other requirements. Also fails to satisfy WP:NCOLLATH. PROD removed on "D1 basketball head coach. Obviously notable", which is not met. GauchoDude (talk) 23:02, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:22, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Passes GNG anyway:[1][2][3][4][5]--Yankees10 23:28, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - in addition to the sources listed by Yankees10, head coaches actually do meet WP:NCOLLATH, which reads: "College athletes and coaches are notable if they have been the subject of non-trivial media coverage beyond merely a repeating of their statistics, mentions in game summaries, or other WP:ROUTINE coverage. Examples would include head coaches, well-known assistant coaches, or players who: 1) Have won a national award (such as those listed in Template:College Football Awards or the equivalent in another sport), or established a major Division I (NCAA) record, 2)Were inducted into the hall of fame in their sport (for example, the College Football Hall of Fame), or 3) Gained national media attention as an individual, not just as a player for a notable team." Rikster2 (talk) 00:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per GNG and NCOLLATH, with the refs supported by Yankees10. Jrcla2 (talk) 01:31, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I read the phrase "Examples would include head coaches, well-known assistant coaches, or players who: ..." as using a serial comma, meaning the entire phrase is subject to the list following for which the subject does not meet. Additionally, above GNG evidence seems lukewarm. Of the 5 articles provided, one leads to a broken page and two I find as WP:ROUTINE about him either joining or leaving a team. GauchoDude (talk) 12:58, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - you are not reading it correctly. It is saying that head coaches, well known assistants and players who (with list). The clue is the third item which reads "not just a player for a notable team." It doesn't say "player or coach for a notable team. Rikster2 (talk) 13:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Yankees10, Rikster, and Jrcla2 as an NCAA Division I head coach. Ejgreen77 (talk) 04:16, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In the modern media era, the overwhelming majority of Division I men's basketball coaches are going to receive sufficient significant coverage in multiple, independent, reliable sources to satisfy the general notability guidelines per WP:GNG; this subject clearly does so per the examples listed by Yankees10 above. FYI, I have always interpreted the third clause of WP:NCOLLATH as effectively incorporating the GNG standard, with the caveat further that some portion of the coverage be national and not just hometown newspaper or in-state coverage; otherwise, the standard embedded in the third clause is hopelessly vague. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.