Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Berklin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. J04n(talk page) 18:18, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Berklin[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Despite surviving A7 for assertion of importance, I could not find any reliable, independent secondary sources to verify them - subject does not appear to be notable. hmssolent\^{Let's convene} _{My patrols} 16:02, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete I haven't found anything via Highbeam or Questia, and nothing on Google other than by the subect, so this lacks sufficient evidence to meet WP:CREATIVE. AllyD (talk) 16:56, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete despite claims of "great success" it doesn't seem as though the subject actually possesses notability. Ducknish (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:17, 11 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.