Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stetson Allie (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Doczilla @SUPERHEROLOGIST 18:11, 3 August 2022 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Stetson Allie (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet the criteria of WP:NBASE nor the previous, more lenient criteria for notability. He never reached the majors, never represented his country internationally and wasn't even a particularly highly regarded prospect. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople and Baseball. Dennis C. Abrams (talk) 15:18, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Meets WP:GNG for sure, I don't think any of those newspaper.com links from the first AfD made it into the article. Claiming he
wasn't even a particularly highly regarded prospect
is odd for someone who got a $2.25 million bonus in 2010, who was throwing over 100 mph when it wasn't done as commonly as it is now.[1][2] – Muboshgu (talk) 15:40, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Comment agree with above, an above-average draft pick that didn't pan out. Seems to have thrown 4 or 5 shutouts, so that's something. Oaktree b (talk) 20:14, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Passes WP:GNG as he has received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources such as the ones listed above and this one from the article. Note that failing WP:NBASE is not grounds for deletion. Alvaldi (talk) 11:22, 28 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:GNG and WP:BASIC. Ejgreen77 (talk) 10:34, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per GNG, which makes whether he reached the majors or played internationally irrelevant. Rlendog (talk) 02:20, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:GNG. In addition to the refs provided, I distinctly remember reading a feature article on him in either Sports Illustrated or ESPN Magazine heading into the draft although I can't seem to find it online anywhere. Best, GPL93 (talk) 14:41, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.