Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sterwins
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:11, 15 September 2022 (UTC)
Sterwins[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Sterwins (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Not sufficient WP:RS to pass WP:NCORP Dark Juliorik (talk) 09:48, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and France. Shellwood (talk) 09:55, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete: When looking for sources, I found none. Article creator's first edit was creating this page (in their user page, no less (not in violation of policy; still.)) Moving to draftspace would be a good compromise, but in my eyes, it's deserving of a delete. Asparagusus (interaction) 02:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
- Delete can not find any coverage, lack of WP:RS.Fabiobengario (talk) 10:07, 14 September 2022 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.