Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stercorous

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. Eluchil404 (talk) 01:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stercorous

Definition article, Wikipedia is not a dictionary. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 05:48, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as a possible neologism (if the article's text is to be believed), or an outright hoax, given the definition here. Ray^Talk 05:53, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Unreferenced, no confirmation of notability. WWGB (talk) 06:13, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, because we're not a dictionary, and certainly not a dictionary of hoaxes. Even my Latin stretches far enough to establish that this isn't kosher. Gonzonoir (talk) 16:51, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Nonsensical hoax. Deor (talk) 22:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

At this point, I think this is fairly well established as a hoax, and is a snowball candidate. -- BeezHive (talk|contribs) 00:42, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.