Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephon Marbury Online Initiative

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Per WP:SNOW Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle friendly) 20:56, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Stephon Marbury Online Initiative[edit]

Procedural nom, as CSD and Prod have been unsuccessful. El on ka 06:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. -- El on ka 06:51, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete A7 The deletion tag has been stripped multiple times by non-admins trying to keep this joke going and this needs to go. Completely non-notable nonsense that no one takes seriously (and I'm sure the NBA reserves the right to nullify suspect web balloting efforts like this). Nate • (chatter) 07:05, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - No wp:reliable sources to assert notability. --Omarcheeseboro (talk) 08:08, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Unsourced and definitely not notable enough to get an article.--Seba5618 (talk) 14:24, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:N. Also, according to WP:MEME, a Google test can prove non-notability of a meme. I get only 4 hits for "Stephon Marbury Online Initiative." However, I would also question whether this is, as the article states, a true meme and not just a short-lived initiative and meaningless fad. Luinfana (talk) 15:13, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not even a meme, just one of those attempts to twist online votes for a joke. Even if successful, this campaign should only be part of the Stephon Marbury article. Totnesmartin (talk) 18:25, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons already stated. It doesn't belong anywhere on Wikipedia - it's a dumb joke from one or two idiots. JustSomeRandomGuy32 (talk) 01:48, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.