Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephenie Steers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners . Consensus is to redirect. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 22:10, 23 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stephenie Steers[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Per WP:NOPAGE this article should be redirected to Miss Oregon where the information is best presented in context as part of a list. The proposed redirect does not require establishing notability, which is hard to do in these cases anyway. At last report she was cleaning teeth, which does not suggest any future updates being done to this article. Legacypac (talk) 05:43, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oregon-related deletion discussions. sst✈^(discuss) 09:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as her notability is for winning the Miss Oregon title and notability is not temporary. Subject easily crosses the verifiability and notability thresholds with significant coverage in reliable third-party sources. Notability is a threshold, not a competition, and this is an encyclopedia, not a social media page requiring frequent status updates. - Dravecky (talk) 18:33, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

to be expected as the article creator who put together the low quality sources and trivia. Its a formula article like a bunch of others. Legacypac (talk) 09:17, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on content, not contributors. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:10, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Miss Oregon#Winners as suggested by the nom and for the usual reasons (cheap, plausible, etc.) as well as my commentary on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lucy Fleck. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:54, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a WP:GNG pass, per Dravecky. Ejgreen77 (talk) 01:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copy paste keep vote with 3 seconds does not leave time to evaluate anything. Legacypac (talk) 03:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I did do evaluation before I voted. This AfD has been sitting open for nearly two weeks, so there was plenty of time to do it, and to assume otherwise is in very bad faith. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:50, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great, then can you supply some evidence of "significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject" and ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it need not be the main topic of the source material." No blogs, fansites, or pageant company please. Legacypac (talk) 04:22, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.