Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Williams (Magician)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. —Tom Morris (talk) 15:04, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Stephen Williams (Magician)[edit]
- Stephen Williams (Magician) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- Article created by sockpuppet of a paid editor here
- WP:VANITY - on two puff sources + 1 "review" + 1 YouTube video
This was on day #7 of the prod until a SPA IP account removed the PROD. Strangely from the same country and province as the Sockmaster. PeterWesco (talk) 22:19, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - if there's notability here, I can't see it. Stalwart111 00:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Magic-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 05:13, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete A not notable person. Samuel petan (talk) 18:36, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as non-notable, no in-depth mentions, only self-published & minor listings.TheLongTone (talk) 09:42, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:19, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete -- presenting on 14 shows and winning a junior prize does not amount to notability: still NN. Peterkingiron (talk) 16:11, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.