Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen R. Brown

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Daniel (talk) 03:50, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen R. Brown[edit]

Stephen R. Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

BLP of an individual who would not have any notability but for his crimes, which seem ROTM so this biography does not meet WP:PERP. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Mccapra (talk) 05:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Routine white-collar criminals don't merit articles. Clarityfiend (talk) 10:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Per Gene93k, accused is even less notable than convicted. Clarityfiend (talk) 07:41, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per Clarityfiend....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:10, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Person accused of rather unremarkable white-collar crimes. This person lacks non-trivial independent RS coverage to satisfy WP:BASIC, and I'm not finding much independent RS interest in the alleged crimes. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete: Not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 03:17, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.