Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen King works related to The Dark Tower series
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SOFTDELETE. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:27, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
- Stephen King works related to The Dark Tower series (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This appears to be original research, and is certainly an attractive nuisance for original research. It is perfect content for http://stephenking.com/darktower/connections/ but not for Wikipedia, which requires coverage in reliable sources. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:24, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz talk 01:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 07:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Winged Blades Godric 07:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - The article is nothing but a large list of OR and trivia. The only sources that really exist that talk about this idea at all are the actual King books themselves, fansites, and the official King website. I'm not really finding any reliable sources that talk about the topic, nor even much that talks about any of the individual entries in the list. 64.183.45.226 (talk) 16:50, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.