Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Jacob Jimbangan (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 03:44, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Jacob Jimbangan

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deleted last month after Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Jacob Jimbangan, still fails WP:NPOL. Fram (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and Malaysia. Fram (talk) 09:27, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No need for deletion due to this person is a literally a notable person from Sabah and this wiki page has approved

Source and references for the wikipedia:

Link 1: https://pru.sinarharian.com.my/calon/4175/stephen-jacob-jimbangan

Link 2: https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/158899/can-jimbangan-create-an-upset-/

Link 3: https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/amp/category/bahasa/tempatan/2022/12/11/bekas-pemimpin-bersatu-sabah-sertai-pgrs-kini-hanya-cerita-di-kedai-kopi/

Link 4: https://www.astroawani.com/berita-politik/stephen-jimbangan-sahkan-sudah-hantar-surat-letak-jawatan-sebagai-presiden-gagasan-rakyat-404130?

J4CKKGT (talk) 02:37, 6 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting, this was just deleted via AFD a month ago, how can it have been recreated so soon? DId it not qualify for CSD G4? We need to hear from more editors than the nominator and the article creator.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:21, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The article is different enough in form from the first version that I wouldn't have invoked G4 if I had come across this before the nominator did, but it admittedly isn't markedly different in substance. He still has not held any role that would confer an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, and the article still isn't sourced anywhere close to well enough to claim that he would satisfy WP:GNG instead of having to pass NPOL. Bearcat (talk) 16:04, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete perhaps I'm mistaken, but he simply appears to be an unelected candidate, which colours the media coverage of him. SportingFlyer T·C 13:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.