Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Allott

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:57, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Allott[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I suspect this is a puff piece written by a paid agent. In any case I do not think he is notable. Many links are dead and many, if any, of the WP:RS do not actually refer to him. Bosley John Bosley (talk) 17:12, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

These two appear to be substantial independent RS: [1] [2]. Actually the second one may be a blog. Kendall-K1 (talk) 17:31, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:43, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete fails gng the sourcing just does not measure up. Is the term WP:Coatrack?Dlohcierekim (talk) 02:02, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ad Orientem (talk) 03:32, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.