Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Aldrich

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. RL0919 (talk) 15:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stephen Aldrich

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Low-level county court judge, I see no indication of encyclopedic notability whatsoever. BD2412 T 15:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Law, and Minnesota. BD2412 T 15:32, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- Article is WP:BLP1E material built around a group's complaint, which is not an event that reaches article-level notability. The two news sources in the article are from the same date. The source to a defunct website for a complaining group doesn't meet WP:BLP inclusion standards, and the fourth source is a database. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:59, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Subject was a district court judge, not a county court judge. He retired as a judge in 2010. Although it is possible that he may meet our lax standards of notability on the basis of other aspects of his career, this page is nothing but an attack page. Kablammo (talk) 13:49, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete -- Lack of continuing coverage suggests lack of notability. Though I'm not sure of our standards for notability of state district judges, the lack of any content worth keeping in the current page mitigates towards deletion. Should the subject deserve an article, it would be best to simply start from scratch. Arcendeight (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.