Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Payne

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

~~The result was delete.~~ Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:18, 24 December 2011 (UTC) Addendum: The result was Keep. From the closing administrator's talk page (verbatim):[reply]

"Regarding Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Payne, what is your rationale for deletion of the article? In the AfD, you simply wrote "The result was delete." without providing any analysis of the !votes and arguments presented in the AfD discussion. Clarification of your rationale for this AfD result would be most helpful. Please respond at the discussion page for the AfD page here: Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Payne. Thank you for your consideration. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:02, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out. It was a genuine error (perhaps I inadvertantly clicked on the wrong button). The result was of of course a clear keep, and I will restore the the article. Thanks again. --Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:10, 24 December 2011 (UTC)"

(Non-administrator addendum correction). Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:39, 24 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Payne

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Person is not notable Nicholas Perkins (T•C) 08:25, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Can't find any substantial citations among the self-publicity (searched using Google). Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:12, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:46, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 08:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep or redirect and mention at Weightism. Stephanie Payne is an important Australian activist defending people against discrimination. Reliable sources do exist, see e.g. Yahoo News, Herald Sun or some of the sources listed in our article. Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 09:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In that case I'd have no objection to redirect, mention. Chiswick Chap (talk) 17:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merge Weightism related content to Weightism and redirect. Stuartyeates (talk) 04:52, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I dunno - I still don't see anything that even justifies a redirect. She speaks up about the issues and makes public appearances for certain causes. Her and hundreds of thousands of others. --Legis (talk - contribs) 07:12, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia has a lot of articles about people who make public appearances for certain causes. The important thing is how are the appearances noted by media and the public. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 10:57, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TigerShark (talk) 14:52, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:GNG. Payne has been the subject of substantial coverage in multiple reliable sources, as demonstrated in the article's references section (e.g. [1][2][3]). Pburka (talk) 15:27, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Significant coverage in reliable sources confers with this topic's inclusion in Wikipedia: Herald-Sun, Yahoo News 1, Yahoo News 2. Northamerica1000^(talk) 18:02, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep [4] is all about her. She gets coverage. Dream Focus 21:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.