Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Angelini
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Theme to Neighbours. Will leave the history in place in case anyone wants to merge anything. J04n(talk page) 23:26, 30 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Stephanie Angelini (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable singer. She doesn't appear to have had a song released (outside of her website/YouTube) or chart and hasn't won any major awards. I suspect that if it wasn't for her appearance in the competition to sing the Neighbours theme tune, this article wouldn't have been created. I think WP:ONEEVENT applies here. - JuneGloom Talk 16:10, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your reasoning. True this event is the biggest event to happen to Stephanie, though it is definitely an event worth merit. She is also becoming well-known and has a massive following. I myself have not added any other information/events about her as references are hard to found for these previous notable appearances/previous work she has undertaken. Example. Working with Jamie Redfern and appearing as a regular on his Television showcase on Foxtel. I believe the public would be very interested in finding further information about Stephanie Angelini especially on Wikipedia, as this information does not exist on her webpage or anywhere else on the internet at present. Only time will tell how noble she will become. Mick ang (talk) 16:50, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. Given that she won the competition and will be heard every time Neighbours is shown, I would have thought that keeping something on her would make sense. If there isn't much beyond this competition/theme tune then perhaps merge somewhere else (e.g. here) until there's more to justify an article. --Michig (talk) 20:46, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:38, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Darkwind (talk) 21:05, 16 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 16:39, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect or Delete - Her having an award has nothing to do with establishing basic notability. That is the first thing that needs to be looked at. If she fails WP:GNG, then there is no need to find out if she has other music or if she won any awards. When looking for references, there are few that are WP:RS and they are all about her singing the theme song. If we assume that there is enough coverage, this would still make her notable for one event. As such, I would recommend including a sentence or two in the Neighbours article with a redirect. If that doesn't gain consensus, then simply delete as she fails general notability guidelines. --FoolMeOnce2Times (talk) 17:28, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.