Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephanie Andujar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not the strongest consensus, but in the absence of any comments supporting deletion this is where we are. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stephanie Andujar

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Minor actress. A very short resume, despite the padding, with only a few roles even having names. Calton | Talk 00:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 00:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep She was billed 9th in Marjorie Prime (odd IMBD mentions her first for that flick and the Wiki article mentions her 9th), 15th in a USD 28 mil budget Liam Neeson flick, and 7th for Precious which got USD 60 mil at the box office. Oh, and all of her roles had names. ₪RicknAsia₪ 02:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

odd IMBD mentions her first for that flick - Because, as even a cursory glance would tell you, the IMDB listing for Marjorie Prime is in alphabetical order.
Oh, and all of her roles had names - "Cashier" is a name?[1] And you think 15th billing is noteworthy -- especially since the credits are clearly in order of appearance?
And despite your attempts to inflate the importance of such low billing, I should point out that her name doesn't appear on the posters -- at least in legible font -- for those very very important roles. --Calton | Talk 05:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. Hhkohh (talk) 13:56, 6 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 09:17, 7 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep borderline WP:NACTOR as Marjorie Prime role seems quite prominent according to the plot section and in Precious (film) her role gets a description Atlantic306 (talk) 19:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 10:08, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 23:24, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep She meets the bare minimum standards for WP:NACTOR on the basis of having major roles in at least two feature films that are, themselves, notable. That said, this is very marginal. Chetsford (talk) 04:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Strikerforce^Talk 20:33, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.