Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StepGreen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 17:06, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

StepGreen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable web service. Complete lack of independent coverage found online. Largoplazo (talk) 00:39, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. After a web search, StepGreen seems to be the name of several entities, and this API is not displayed in the results. Notability cannot be established. Meiloorun (talk) 🍁 00:49, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti ^Talk 18:28, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: The article content is effectively documentation and how-to guidance for this terminated site/project. Aside from their surviving Wordpress project blog, Google Books shows a few passing mentions, but I am not seeing anything strong enough to indicate notability, whether by WP:ORGDEPTH or WP:GNG. AllyD (talk) 19:36, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pennsylvania-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:54, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.