Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stella Ronner-Grubačić

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 11:01, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stella Ronner-Grubačić

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Deletion requested via OTRS by subject's representative. Their rationale is given below. As the nominator, I am filing this solely on their behalf, and take no position myself as to whether the article should be kept or deleted.

Nomination rationale:

the person/ subject of the article is not a notable person
the topic has NOT received significant coverage in reliable sources; even more, the quoted sources are unreliable, trivial, not-objective, biased, non-independent, paid media controlled by anti-EU political activists. The whole article is the malicious product of a political activist who calls himself Bukovina Sengen, (a hint to local political issues).
the Wikipedia article makes negative assumptions, without providing needed context, by narrowing down the whole biography of the Ambassador to just two so called controversies.
the articles passes along a random hoax and gossips, posting indiscriminate collections of information. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:57, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Typically individuals that are Official Diplomatic Ambassadors qualify for inclusion, here at Wikipedia, under WP:NPOL. As Ms. Ronner-Grubačić is the Netherlands Offical Ambassador to Romania and Moldova, which is cited and referenced in the article. In addition, I found the article well written – well sourced – and not showing any unduly weighted Point of View. Yes, there is a Heading 2.2 Controversy, however, again found it cited and sourced. ShoesssS ^Talk 15:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. AmericanAir88 (talk) 01:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:47, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it is long standing policy that ambassadors are not default notable for such, and there is no other claim to notability for Ronner-Grubacic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 16:49, 25 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 09:54, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per request; there doesn't seem to be a significant amount of independent coverage of her (apart from a recent scandal). power~enwiki (π, ν) 23:59, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Common_outcomes#Political_figures_not_elected_to_public_office explicitly states ambassadors are not inherently notable. Also, it might not be NPOV based on the creator being a single-purpose editor/account. originalmess^{how u doin that busta rhyme?} 01:32, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.