Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefano Bianca
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 19:41, 20 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Stefano Bianca (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable, no reliable sources (fails WP:RS after performing a google search. Fails WP:BIO. Not every architect in the world needs an article - especially one as unnotable as him. Fattyjwoods (Push my button) 04:30, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep I'm not sure how reliable Archnet.org is, but a number of his publications are listed there[1]. also this from the Metropolitan Museum of Art [2], where he was scheduled as a lecturer. DarkAudit (talk) 04:42, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- Fabrictramp (talk) 15:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Archnet is a pretty reliable source in my experience - this guy is clearly published. --Joopercoopers (talk) 17:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I know of this person's work and the information on Archnet is pretty reliable as previously stated by Joopercoopers. Deevincentday (talk) 08:10, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Espresso Addict (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Espresso Addict (talk) 15:46, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. A Google Books search shows pretty clear notability. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:24, 18 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.