Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Krauter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Krauter

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

relatively unknown Enalya (talk) 16:38, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Engineering, and Germany. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:44, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This page lacks secondary source and mainly point to the presentation page of the university that employs him.

No noticeable publications (that can be open to interpretation, that's why I opened this discussion).

He seems pretty active on Twitter as an ENR advocate/militant mainly.

Enalya (talk) 16:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

~~Keep~~ per WP:PROF#C1. Full professors at a good German universities (Paderborn, not UASB) are generally notable (not as an actual notability criterion, but they generally only give these positions to people who meet our criteria) and he seems no exception. If it were only #C1 I'd give this a weak keep (because we need more than that to build an article) but there's enough coverage of him either for his entrepreneurial activities or as an energy expert [1] [2] [3] to upgrade my opinion to a full keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 18:47, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The person in [4] [5] [6] is not the same one as in the current article. Here are two pictures: Cargo-Partner CEO (on the left) vs the Uni professor. Enalya (talk) 19:59, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, then weak keep. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:11, 12 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep per WP:NPROF C1. I deprodded for procedural reasons (previously prodded) a few years ago, and didn't take to AfD because I thought it looked like a possibly pass of WP:NPROF C1. The Google Scholar record shows lots of highly cited papers in what I understand to be a medium-citation field, including several with low number of coauthors. It's a little difficult to separate the subject from a few other Stefan Krauters. I am surprised that I was unable to find reviews of his book. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Week Keep per C1. The citation record is strong enough for keeping in my opinion. --Mvqr (talk) 11:45, 15 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.