Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stefan Brands

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:17, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan Brands

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Cannot see how this meets WP:NACADEMIC. Edwardx (talk) 16:15, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mathematics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:20, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:21, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Google Scholar citation counts of 1085, 937, 799, 405, etc (with most publications single-authored) give a pass of WP:PROF#C1. And coverage of him personally in Wired, of his company in PC World / Washington Post, and of his inventions in popular-press books also goes a long way towards WP:GNG. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:46, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per David Eppstein. Significant impact clearly meets WP:PROF#1. Bakazaka (talk) 21:40, 9 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep based on H-index / NACADEMIC Chetsford (talk) 19:16, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep citations carry him past WP:NACADEMIC.E.M.Gregory (talk) 14:31, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:BEFORE. A search of Google scholar is needed when an allegation of notability for a scholar is contested. Bearian (talk) 20:30, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.