Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steadfastness and Confrontation Front

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:01, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steadfastness and Confrontation Front

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Seems to be entirely Original Research Qualitatis (talk) 09:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Palestine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep needs more sources for sure, just one external link, but doesn't appear to be WP:OR, as it was formed. SuperCarnivore591 (talk) 01:46, 6 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Not 'original research' at all. More sources might be good, but I don't see how this could be mistaken for original research. --Mrodowicz (talk) 16:49, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I don't see how this is a valid reason to delete. Nonetheless, while researching this topic, I did come across some discrepancies between the sources and this article. I tagged them accordingly, and also added a source to the verifiable information. (There is a possibility that the content I tagged is not OR and that I was simply not thorough enough.) Elspamo4 (talk) 18:19, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.