Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stay the Night (James Blunt song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:38, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Stay the Night (James Blunt song)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No reliable sources available on a google search; seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 16:58, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:48, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as article fails notability criteria for songs. There is no information for a standalone article, the single was not even released and it is an unlikely search term. Armbrust ^Talk _Contribs 19:54, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to James Blunt. Cindamuse (talk) 10:11, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not really sure if there's a point in having this as a redirect: better just to delete the article but leave an entry in the Stay the Night disambig page pointing to James Blunt. It seems unlikely that anyone is going to search for "Stay the Night (James Blunt song), though they might search for "Stay the Night", looking for the song by James Blunt. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 12:33, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Improved page with reputable sources regarding release, cover image and tracklisting. I hope with this information the page can be taken off the articles for deletion list. [TALK] 11:03, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The sources you added give little actual information, and the first appears to be a press release, and a very short one at that. The second one appears to be a German blog. Neither of these sources demonstrate notability or could be considered reliable. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 10:07, 12 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ♪ ♫ Wifione ♫ ♪ _―Œ^{♣Łeave Ξ мessage♣} 11:21, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep First single from new album from the "You're Beautiful" guy. There's significant coverage, only hangup would be that it hasn't charted yet. But again, coverage is significant and reliable. I can add some soon - Theornamentalist (talk) 15:34, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide some links to some of this coverage in the meantime? I have been thus far unable to find any significant coverage in reliable sources. GiftigerWunsch [TALK] 15:54, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, here's what google news turned up (New York Post, Music news and various other worlwide coverage/multilingual) some swiss charts] and I think it shows Germany as having it at Number 31. (I say this sarcastically, but with a grain of sincerity) I've looked into my CrystalBall and I foresee that more coverage will likely be found later, as it's only been a week since this single has been released, and apparently his music has worldwide exposure. - Theornamentalist (talk) 16:42, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - added some references, chart info, and the charts I'm sure could be expanded but I imagine them to change rapidly at this point in the songs release. Anyway, hope this helps - Theornamentalist (talk) 21:13, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.