Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Station X (radio station)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. As a public radio station this may be able to be proven to be notable; if WP:GNG-meeting sources are provided a new article may be writable. In the meantime, however, the consensus is to apply the WP:TNT. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 04:04, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Station X (radio station)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. Can't find any reliable sourcing to prove notability. Lithorien (talk) 16:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails notablity guideline for companies. Article creator has an admitted conflict of interest [1]. --Drm310 (talk) 17:21, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. clpo13_(talk) 18:03, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:ORG. no third party coverage provided. LibStar (talk) 05:48, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom and above reasons. Harry ^{Let us have speaks} 08:58, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.