Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/State terrorism in Guatemala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 01:42, 6 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

State terrorism in Guatemala[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article provides no information that is not covered in greater depth and with better references in 1954 Guatemalan coup d'état and articles in Category:Human rights in Guatemala. I would think a main article for Human rights in Guatemala, at least, would need to be developed first before branching this off. As it stands, the article does not even assert that a relation between the coup and the concept of state terrorism as its title would imply, and nearly all editing activity in the last 5 years seems to be a back-and-froth as to whether to title it "allegations of." - choster (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2012 May 22. Snotbot t • c » 20:50, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Guatemala-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:23, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:24, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →B music ian 22:08, 29 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rename as suggested by the nominator, but, after all, that is not the purpose of AfD. Bearian (talk) 22:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- I didn't suggest any rename. I said that the article as it stands is worthless, and that it does not make any sense to expand it without first covering a more general topic under a different name. Otherwise, I would not have nominated it for deletion.- choster (talk) 22:56, 31 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete -- While I know nothing of the subject the article on the Coup is clearly a well-written NPOV article. The very title of this stub fails WP:POV. Peterkingiron (talk) 21:26, 2 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.