Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/StartupValley

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sarahj2107 (talk) 14:18, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

StartupValley

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources for notability I see nothing substantial since 2012 in Google News. DGG ( talk ) 06:09, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this better satisfies the companies notability guidelines, unlikely notable newly founded local company. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 07:04, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree that there has been nothing substantial written about this stub since I wrote it back in 2012. Jeremy112233 ^{(Lettuce-jibber-jabber?)} 15:23, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.